In the U.S., the misuse of antibiotics in agriculture is one
of the most shocking examples of how private interests have triumphed over the
public interest. More than three-quarters of the antibiotics sold in this
country are routinely fed to healthy poultry and livestock at factory farms to
prevent disease but also to promote growth. The dangers of that practice—the
creation of lethal, antibiotic-resistant organisms—have been recognized for
decades. And yet the practice continues because the meat industry has
successfully blocked strict regulations on antibiotic use. About 2 million
Americans are now infected every year with antibiotic-resistant bacteria from a
variety of sources, and more than 20,000 are killed by them. The annual
healthcare costs stemming from the misuse of antibiotics are estimated to be at
least $20 billion. The financial cost pales beside an unacceptable reality:
Thousands of Americans have died so that chickens and hogs can grow a little
faster.
The corruption of the political system helps to explain the
wide discrepancy between what’s best for the American people and what benefits
the leading food companies. Elected officials accept millions of dollars in
campaign donations from the food industry; government regulators find lucrative
jobs in the industry after leaving office—and as a result, the government now
obeys the companies it’s supposed to regulate.
The battle over the labeling of genetically modified
organisms (GMOs) illustrates the threat to democracy posed by our current food
system. Twenty-five years ago, none of the processed food consumed in the U.S.
contained genetically modified ingredients. Today, about 75 percent of it does.
The spread of GMO crops has greatly increased the sale of glyphosate, now the
most widely used pesticide in America. Studies have found glyphosate in the
raindrops, drinking water, and air of the Midwest. Last year the World Health
Organization declared that glyphosate was “probably carcinogenic to humans.”
More than 90 percent of the American people favor labeling GMO foods so that consumers
can choose whether to buy them. Nevertheless, the House of Representatives
passed an industry-backed bill last year that would prevent states from
requiring labels on GMO food. But then in March, the Senate version of this bill
was rejected by lawmakers.
George Orwell would’ve loved its name: The Safe and Accurate
Food Labeling Act of 2015.
Entire article by Eric Schlosser: http://www.consumerreports.org/food-safety/safer-food-future-now/